Re: [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix

2005-01-28 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whats the purpose of local_irq_disable() here? Locks up my toys in > atkbd_init or IP hash foo functions. fix already posted a couple of days ago, see: -- * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ingo ! > > Could you explain me

Re: [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix

2005-01-28 Thread Olaf Hering
On Sat, Jan 08, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > ChangeSet 1.2316, 2005/01/08 13:53:41-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix > > The early bootup stage is pretty fragile because the idle thread is not > yet > function

Re: [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix

2005-01-28 Thread Olaf Hering
On Sat, Jan 08, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: ChangeSet 1.2316, 2005/01/08 13:53:41-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix The early bootup stage is pretty fragile because the idle thread is not yet functioning as such and so we need

Re: [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix

2005-01-28 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whats the purpose of local_irq_disable() here? Locks up my toys in atkbd_init or IP hash foo functions. fix already posted a couple of days ago, see: -- * Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ingo ! Could you explain me precisely what