* Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whats the purpose of local_irq_disable() here? Locks up my toys in
> atkbd_init or IP hash foo functions.
fix already posted a couple of days ago, see:
--
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo !
>
> Could you explain me
On Sat, Jan 08, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.2316, 2005/01/08 13:53:41-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [PATCH] idle thread preemption fix
>
> The early bootup stage is pretty fragile because the idle thread is not
> yet
> function
On Sat, Jan 08, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
ChangeSet 1.2316, 2005/01/08 13:53:41-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PATCH] idle thread preemption fix
The early bootup stage is pretty fragile because the idle thread is not
yet
functioning as such and so we need
* Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whats the purpose of local_irq_disable() here? Locks up my toys in
atkbd_init or IP hash foo functions.
fix already posted a couple of days ago, see:
--
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo !
Could you explain me precisely what
4 matches
Mail list logo