On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:10:03AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > Jarkko, would you mind staging this patch with the rest of the patch
> > > set?
> >
> > Yes, sure, I can do that. Any additional tag?
>
> Thanks, just these.
I pushed the changes to my tree (also next).
> Mimi
/Jarkko
On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 19:32 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 13:00 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 11:24 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > Rather than accessing the TPM functions by passing a NULL pointer for
> > > the tpm_chip, which causes a lookup for a su
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 13:00 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 11:24 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > Rather than accessing the TPM functions by passing a NULL pointer for
> > the tpm_chip, which causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a
> > hold of a tpm_chip and access th
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 11:24 -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Rather than accessing the TPM functions by passing a NULL pointer for
> the tpm_chip, which causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a
> hold of a tpm_chip and access the TPM functions using it. Also get rid of
> the ima_used_chip
Rather than accessing the TPM functions by passing a NULL pointer for
the tpm_chip, which causes a lookup for a suitable chip every time, get a
hold of a tpm_chip and access the TPM functions using it. Also get rid of
the ima_used_chip variable and use the new ima_tpm_chip variable instead
for dete
5 matches
Mail list logo