Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 06/08, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 08/06/17 15:35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make >> oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. > > >Also, the attached config has "CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m" and

Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 06/08, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 08/06/17 15:35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make >> oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. > > >Also, the attached config has "CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m" and

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 06/08/2017 10:10 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: [...] > The config you attached in the first mail has CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m, here > is my confusion. The config from the link below does not have KVM_BOOK3S_64 > which selects SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU and which in turn selects VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE. > >

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 06/08/2017 10:10 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: [...] > The config you attached in the first mail has CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m, here > is my confusion. The config from the link below does not have KVM_BOOK3S_64 > which selects SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU and which in turn selects VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE. > >

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 08/06/17 22:45, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote: > On 06/08/2017 08:41 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make >>> oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y.

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 08/06/17 22:45, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote: > On 06/08/2017 08:41 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make >>> oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. >> >> Hmm, Murilo

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 06/08/2017 08:41 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: > >> Hi, >> >> How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make >> oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. > > Hmm, Murilo did you confirm the bug still happens on

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 06/08/2017 08:41 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: > >> Hi, >> >> How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make >> oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. > > Hmm, Murilo did you confirm the bug still happens on upstream with

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: > Hi, > > How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make > oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. Hmm, Murilo did you confirm the bug still happens on upstream with that rand config? cheers

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Alexey Kardashevskiy writes: > Hi, > > How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make > oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. Hmm, Murilo did you confirm the bug still happens on upstream with that rand config? cheers

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 08/06/17 15:35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Hi, > > How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make > oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. Also, the attached config has "CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m" and cannot produce the error below, what am I missing

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

On 08/06/17 15:35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Hi, > > How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make > oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. Also, the attached config has "CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=m" and cannot produce the error below, what am I missing

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Hi, How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. On 08/06/17 02:31, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Murilo, > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > [also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4 next-20170607] > [if your

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Hi, How did you manage to have CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n? "make oldconfig" fixes this to CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=y. On 08/06/17 02:31, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Murilo, > > [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] > [also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4 next-20170607] > [if your

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Hi Murilo, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4 next-20170607] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Hi Murilo, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.12-rc4 next-20170607] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Murilo Opsfelder Araujo writes: > When CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n, build fails with the > following: > > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o: In function `.vfio_pci_release': > vfio_pci.c:(.text+0xa98): undefined reference to > `.vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release' >

Re: [PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

Murilo Opsfelder Araujo writes: > When CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n, build fails with the > following: > > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o: In function `.vfio_pci_release': > vfio_pci.c:(.text+0xa98): undefined reference to > `.vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release' >

[PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

When CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n, build fails with the following: drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o: In function `.vfio_pci_release': vfio_pci.c:(.text+0xa98): undefined reference to `.vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release' drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o: In function `.vfio_pci_open':

[PATCH] include/linux/vfio.h: Guard powerpc-specific functions with CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH

When CONFIG_EEH=y and CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH=n, build fails with the following: drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o: In function `.vfio_pci_release': vfio_pci.c:(.text+0xa98): undefined reference to `.vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release' drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.o: In function `.vfio_pci_open':