On May 18, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:33:10AM -0600, Louis Langholtz wrote:
>> memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() functions previously called
>> memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions respectively. The
>> memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec()
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:33:10AM -0600, Louis Langholtz wrote:
> memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() functions previously called
> memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions respectively. The
> memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions took a length parameter
> of type int.
memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() functions previously called
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions respectively. The
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions took a length parameter
of type int. memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() now call
copy_from_iter() and
memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() functions previously called
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions respectively. The
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions took a length parameter
of type int. memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() now call
copy_from_iter() and
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:33:10AM -0600, Louis Langholtz wrote:
memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() functions previously called
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions respectively. The
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions took a length parameter
of type int.
On May 18, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 09:33:10AM -0600, Louis Langholtz wrote:
memcpy_from_msg() and memcpy_to_msg() functions previously called
memcpy_fromiovec() and memcpy_toiovec() functions respectively. The
memcpy_fromiovec() and
6 matches
Mail list logo