On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:59:46 -0400 Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 04:59 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry ... forgot to cc everyone on the last email.
> >>
> >> P.
> >>
> >> 8<
> >>
> >> sprint_symbol_no_offset() returns t
On 06/13/2016 04:59 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>> Sorry ... forgot to cc everyone on the last email.
>>
>> P.
>>
>> 8<
>>
>> sprint_symbol_no_offset() returns the string "function_name [module_name]"
>> where [module_name] is not printed
On Mon, Jun 13 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Sorry ... forgot to cc everyone on the last email.
>
> P.
>
> 8<
>
> sprint_symbol_no_offset() returns the string "function_name [module_name]"
> where [module_name] is not printed for built in kernel functions. This
> means that the initcall
Sorry ... forgot to cc everyone on the last email.
P.
8<
sprint_symbol_no_offset() returns the string "function_name [module_name]"
where [module_name] is not printed for built in kernel functions. This
means that the initcall blacklisting code will now always fail when
comparing module
sprint_symbol_no_offset() returns the string "function_name [module_name]"
where [module_name] is not printed for built in kernel functions. This
means that the initcall blacklisting code will now always fail when
comparing module_init() function names. This patch resolves the issue by
comparing
5 matches
Mail list logo