"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Thanks for the review! One open question below.
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
>>> [CC widened, so that some more review might come in. Rusty?]
>>
>> Sure.
>>
>> Looks good.
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" writes:
> [CC widened, so that some more review might come in. Rusty?]
Sure.
Looks good. but:
> .B EBUSY
> The module's initialization routine failed.
Possibly. You should mention that the individual module's
initialization routine can return other errors as appr
[CC widened, so that some more review might come in. Rusty?]
Hello Kees,
Comments below.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> This updates init_module(2) to reflect the reality of 2.6+ module
> loading interfaces. It additionally drops references to the extra
> deprecated module
This updates init_module(2) to reflect the reality of 2.6+ module
loading interfaces. It additionally drops references to the extra
deprecated module functions create_module(2) and query_module(2).
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
---
man2/delete_module.2 |7 ++--
man2/init_module.2 | 90 +++
4 matches
Mail list logo