On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 17:00 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 12:23 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > From: Jeff Layton
> >
> > The IMA assessment code tries to use the i_version counter to detect
> > when changes to a file have occurred. Many
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 17:00 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 12:23 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > From: Jeff Layton
> >
> > The IMA assessment code tries to use the i_version counter to detect
> > when changes to a file have occurred. Many filesystems don't increment
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 12:23 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton
>
> The IMA assessment code tries to use the i_version counter to detect
> when changes to a file have occurred. Many filesystems don't increment
> it properly (or at all) so detecting changes
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 12:23 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton
>
> The IMA assessment code tries to use the i_version counter to detect
> when changes to a file have occurred. Many filesystems don't increment
> it properly (or at all) so detecting changes with that is not
From: Jeff Layton
The IMA assessment code tries to use the i_version counter to detect
when changes to a file have occurred. Many filesystems don't increment
it properly (or at all) so detecting changes with that is not always
reliable.
That check should really be gated on
From: Jeff Layton
The IMA assessment code tries to use the i_version counter to detect
when changes to a file have occurred. Many filesystems don't increment
it properly (or at all) so detecting changes with that is not always
reliable.
That check should really be gated on IS_I_VERSION. When
6 matches
Mail list logo