Re: [PATCH] ipv4: remove a call to skb_queue_len() in inet_diag.c

From: Thomas Hisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:29:21 +0100 > remove unneeded call to skb_queue_len (skb_dequeue already checks queuelen) > and > replace a sizeof() by a Netlink Macro > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You don't understand the code you are

[PATCH] ipv4: remove a call to skb_queue_len() in inet_diag.c

remove unneeded call to skb_queue_len (skb_dequeue already checks queuelen) and replace a sizeof() by a Netlink Macro Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- sorry, my previous version of this patch didn't conform to the Codingstyle document. now everything should be fine.

[PATCH] ipv4: remove a call to skb_queue_len() in inet_diag.c

remove unneeded call to skb_queue_len (skb_dequeue already checks queuelen) and replace a sizeof() by a Netlink Macro Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/ipv4/inet_diag.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c

[PATCH] ipv4: remove a call to skb_queue_len() in inet_diag.c

remove unneeded call to skb_queue_len (skb_dequeue already checks queuelen) and replace a sizeof() by a Netlink Macro Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/ipv4/inet_diag.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c

[PATCH] ipv4: remove a call to skb_queue_len() in inet_diag.c

remove unneeded call to skb_queue_len (skb_dequeue already checks queuelen) and replace a sizeof() by a Netlink Macro Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- sorry, my previous version of this patch didn't conform to the Codingstyle document. now everything should be fine.

Re: [PATCH] ipv4: remove a call to skb_queue_len() in inet_diag.c

From: Thomas Hisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:29:21 +0100 remove unneeded call to skb_queue_len (skb_dequeue already checks queuelen) and replace a sizeof() by a Netlink Macro Signed-off-by: Thomas Hisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] You don't understand the code you are editing :-)