On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:00:29PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest
> of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs.
>
> It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of
> IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:00:29PM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest
> of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs.
>
> It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of
> IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other
Marc,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:00:29 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest
> of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs.
>
> It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of
> IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other
Marc,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:00:29 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest
> of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs.
>
> It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of
> IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other
Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest
of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs.
It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other irqchips that rely on
this behaviour (GICv2m and Marvell's ODMI controller).
Moving an SPI around doesn't require any extra work from the rest
of the stack, and specially not for MSI-generated SPIs.
It is then worth returning IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE instead of
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK, and simplify the other irqchips that rely on
this behaviour (GICv2m and Marvell's ODMI controller).
6 matches
Mail list logo