Re: [PATCH] ix86: really make user_mode() work correctly for VM86 mode

2015-05-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On May 28, 2015 1:16 AM, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > > > > While commit efa7045103 ("x86/asm/entry: Make user_mode() work > > correctly if regs came from VM86 mode") claims that "user_mode() is now > > identical to user_mode_vm()", this wasn't actually the case - no prior

Re: [PATCH] ix86: really make user_mode() work correctly for VM86 mode

2015-05-28 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On May 28, 2015 1:16 AM, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > > While commit efa7045103 ("x86/asm/entry: Make user_mode() work > correctly if regs came from VM86 mode") claims that "user_mode() is now > identical to user_mode_vm()", this wasn't actually the case - no prior > commit made it so. That's embarrass

[PATCH] ix86: really make user_mode() work correctly for VM86 mode

2015-05-28 Thread Jan Beulich
While commit efa7045103 ("x86/asm/entry: Make user_mode() work correctly if regs came from VM86 mode") claims that "user_mode() is now identical to user_mode_vm()", this wasn't actually the case - no prior commit made it so. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Cc: Andy Lutomirski --- arch/x86/include/as