Re: [PATCH] kbuild: implement modules.order, take #2

2007-12-12 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:04:30PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > When multiple built-in modules (especially drivers) provide the same > capability, they're prioritized by link order specified by the order > listed in Makefile. This implicit ordering is lost for loadable > modules. > > When driver mod

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: implement modules.order, take #2

2007-12-09 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:04:30PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > When multiple built-in modules (especially drivers) provide the same > capability, they're prioritized by link order specified by the order > listed in Makefile. This implicit ordering is lost for loadable > modules. > > When driver mod

[PATCH] kbuild: implement modules.order, take #2

2007-12-07 Thread Tejun Heo
When multiple built-in modules (especially drivers) provide the same capability, they're prioritized by link order specified by the order listed in Makefile. This implicit ordering is lost for loadable modules. When driver modules are loaded by udev, what comes first in modules.alias file is sele