On Thursday, October 20, 2016 3:08:14 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:00 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of this.
> >
> >+extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
> >+extern void mmiocpy(void *,
On Thursday, October 20, 2016 3:08:14 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:00 +0100 Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of this.
> >
> >+extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
> >+extern void mmiocpy(void *, const void *, size_t);
>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:33:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:20:17AM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Good catch, I'm surprised you're the first one who reported it. This patch
> > seems to do the trick for me:
>
> And me, thanks, so...
>
> >
> > From:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:33:27PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:20:17AM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Good catch, I'm surprised you're the first one who reported it. This patch
> > seems to do the trick for me:
>
> And me, thanks, so...
>
> >
> > From:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:33:27 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:20:17AM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Good catch, I'm surprised you're the first one who reported it. This patch
> > seems to do the trick for me:
>
> And me, thanks,
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:33:27 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:20:17AM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Good catch, I'm surprised you're the first one who reported it. This patch
> > seems to do the trick for me:
>
> And me, thanks, so...
>
> >
> > From:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:20:17AM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Good catch, I'm surprised you're the first one who reported it. This patch
> seems to do the trick for me:
And me, thanks, so...
>
> From: Nicholas Piggin
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:13:33 +1100
> Subject:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:20:17AM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Good catch, I'm surprised you're the first one who reported it. This patch
> seems to do the trick for me:
And me, thanks, so...
>
> From: Nicholas Piggin
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 01:13:33 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] kbuild:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:17:02 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:08:14PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Fair point, what about leaving those as they are, and also adding
> > them to asm-prototypes.h protected with GENKSYMS ifdef? It's not
On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:17:02 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:08:14PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Fair point, what about leaving those as they are, and also adding
> > them to asm-prototypes.h protected with GENKSYMS ifdef? It's not
> > beautiful, but
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:08:14PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Fair point, what about leaving those as they are, and also adding
> them to asm-prototypes.h protected with GENKSYMS ifdef? It's not
> beautiful, but still better than armksyms.c before Al's patches (or
> at least no worse).
I
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 03:08:14PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Fair point, what about leaving those as they are, and also adding
> them to asm-prototypes.h protected with GENKSYMS ifdef? It's not
> beautiful, but still better than armksyms.c before Al's patches (or
> at least no worse).
I
Hi Russell,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:37:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > I'm not in favour of
Hi Russell,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:37:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > I'm not in favour of this.
>> >
>> >+extern void mmioset(void *,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:37:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of this.
> >
> >+extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
> >+extern void mmiocpy(void *, const
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:37:30AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > I'm not in favour of this.
> >
> >+extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
> >+extern void mmiocpy(void *, const void *, size_t);
> >
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> I'm not in favour of this.
>
>+extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
>+extern void mmiocpy(void *, const void *, size_t);
>+
> #ifndef __ARMBE__
> static inline void
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> I'm not in favour of this.
>
>+extern void mmioset(void *, unsigned int, size_t);
>+extern void mmiocpy(void *, const void *, size_t);
>+
> #ifndef __ARMBE__
> static inline void memset_io(volatile void __iomem
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:00 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:02:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:52:06 PM CEST Michal Marek wrote:
> > > Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> > > > This
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:32:00 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:02:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:52:06 PM CEST Michal Marek wrote:
> > > Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> > > > This adds an
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:02:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:52:06 PM CEST Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> > > This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
> > > broken symbol versioning for symbols
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:02:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:52:06 PM CEST Michal Marek wrote:
> > Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> > > This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
> > > broken symbol versioning for symbols
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:52:06 PM CEST Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> > This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
> > broken symbol versioning for symbols exported from assembler
> > files.
> >
> > In addition to the header, we
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 4:52:06 PM CEST Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> > This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
> > broken symbol versioning for symbols exported from assembler
> > files.
> >
> > In addition to the header, we
Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
> broken symbol versioning for symbols exported from assembler
> files.
>
> In addition to the header, we have to do these other small
> changes:
>
> - move the 'extern' declarations out
Dne 17.10.2016 v 14:26 Arnd Bergmann napsal(a):
> This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
> broken symbol versioning for symbols exported from assembler
> files.
>
> In addition to the header, we have to do these other small
> changes:
>
> - move the 'extern' declarations out
This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
broken symbol versioning for symbols exported from assembler
files.
In addition to the header, we have to do these other small
changes:
- move the 'extern' declarations out of memset_io/memcpy_io
to make them visible to the symbol
This adds an asm/asm-prototypes.h header for ARM to fix the
broken symbol versioning for symbols exported from assembler
files.
In addition to the header, we have to do these other small
changes:
- move the 'extern' declarations out of memset_io/memcpy_io
to make them visible to the symbol
28 matches
Mail list logo