On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:10:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
> > As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
> > set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
>
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:16 +0800, Adam Lee wrote:
> As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
> set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
>
> So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making
>
As 67d34a6a391369269a2e5dba8a5f42cc4cd50231 said, 'oldnoconfig' doesn't
set new symbols to 'n', but instead sets it to their default values.
So, this patch replace 'oldnoconfig' with 'olddefconfig', stop making
people confused.
PS: the document in conf.c fixed in another mail, "[PATCH] [Signed-of
3 matches
Mail list logo