Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-17 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:31:33AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > From: Vivek Goyal > Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in > VMCOREINFO > Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500 > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HA

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-16 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
From: Petr Tesarik Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:36:10 +0100 > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:54:23 +0900 (JST) > HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > >> From: Petr Tesarik >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: r

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-14 Thread Petr Tesarik
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:54:23 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > From: Petr Tesarik > Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in > VMCOREINFO > Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:31:45 +0100 > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:35 +0900 (JST) > &

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-14 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
From: Petr Tesarik Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:31:45 +0100 > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:35 +0900 (JST) > HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > >> From: Petr Tesarik >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: r

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-14 Thread Petr Tesarik
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:35 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > From: Petr Tesarik > Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in > VMCOREINFO > Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:48:10 +0100 > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500 > > Vivek Goy

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-13 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
From: Petr Tesarik Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:48:10 +0100 > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500 > Vivek Goyal wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HATAYAMA, Daisuke wrote: >> &

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-13 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500 > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HATAYAMA, Daisuke wrote: >> >> >> (2014/11/13 17:06), Petr Tesarik wrote: >> >On T

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-13 Thread Petr Tesarik
> > >>From: Vivek Goyal > > >>Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in > > >>VMCOREINFO > > >>Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500 > > >> > > >>>On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, HATAYAM

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-13 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HATAYAMA, Daisuke wrote: > > > (2014/11/13 17:06), Petr Tesarik wrote: > >On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:17:09 +0900 (JST) > >HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > > > >>From: Vivek Goyal > >>Subject: Re: [PATCH] kd

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-13 Thread HATAYAMA, Daisuke
(2014/11/13 17:06), Petr Tesarik wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:17:09 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500 On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-13 Thread Petr Tesarik
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:17:09 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > From: Vivek Goyal > Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in > VMCOREINFO > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500 > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, H

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-12 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
From: Petr Tesarik Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:14:34 +0100 > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:40:42 +0900 (JST) > HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > >> Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-12 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500 > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: >> Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of >>

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-12 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of > phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make > sense because to refer to value of the phys_base, it's necessary to > get the value of

Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-12 Thread Petr Tesarik
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:40:42 +0900 (JST) HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of > phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make > sense because to refer to value of the phys_base, it's necessary to > get the value of

[PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO

2014-11-11 Thread HATAYAMA Daisuke
Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make sense because to refer to value of the phys_base, it's necessary to get the value of phys_base itself we are now about to refer to. Userland tools related to