On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:31:33AM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> From: Vivek Goyal
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in
> VMCOREINFO
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500
>
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HA
From: Petr Tesarik
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:36:10 +0100
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:54:23 +0900 (JST)
> HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>
>> From: Petr Tesarik
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: r
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:54:23 +0900 (JST)
HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> From: Petr Tesarik
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in
> VMCOREINFO
> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:31:45 +0100
>
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:35 +0900 (JST)
> &
From: Petr Tesarik
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 09:31:45 +0100
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:35 +0900 (JST)
> HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>
>> From: Petr Tesarik
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: r
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:35 +0900 (JST)
HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> From: Petr Tesarik
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in
> VMCOREINFO
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:48:10 +0100
>
> > On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500
> > Vivek Goy
From: Petr Tesarik
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:48:10 +0100
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HATAYAMA, Daisuke wrote:
>> &
From: Vivek Goyal
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:25:48 -0500
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HATAYAMA, Daisuke wrote:
>>
>>
>> (2014/11/13 17:06), Petr Tesarik wrote:
>> >On T
> > >>From: Vivek Goyal
> > >>Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in
> > >>VMCOREINFO
> > >>Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500
> > >>
> > >>>On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, HATAYAM
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:30:21PM +0900, HATAYAMA, Daisuke wrote:
>
>
> (2014/11/13 17:06), Petr Tesarik wrote:
> >On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:17:09 +0900 (JST)
> >HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> >
> >>From: Vivek Goyal
> >>Subject: Re: [PATCH] kd
(2014/11/13 17:06), Petr Tesarik wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:17:09 +0900 (JST)
HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
From: Vivek Goyal
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:17:09 +0900 (JST)
HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> From: Vivek Goyal
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in
> VMCOREINFO
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500
>
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, H
From: Petr Tesarik
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:14:34 +0100
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:40:42 +0900 (JST)
> HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>
>> Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address
From: Vivek Goyal
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump, x86: report actual value of phys_base in VMCOREINFO
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:12:05 -0500
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
>> Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of
>>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:40:42PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of
> phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make
> sense because to refer to value of the phys_base, it's necessary to
> get the value of
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:40:42 +0900 (JST)
HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:
> Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of
> phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make
> sense because to refer to value of the phys_base, it's necessary to
> get the value of
Currently, VMCOREINFO note information reports the virtual address of
phys_base that is assigned to symbol phys_base. But this doesn't make
sense because to refer to value of the phys_base, it's necessary to
get the value of phys_base itself we are now about to refer to.
Userland tools related to
16 matches
Mail list logo