On Thu, 2014-09-25 at 06:00 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> It's not you, it's checkpatch.pl plus the fairly common tendency to give
> that thing a lot more respect than it deserves...
>
> Basically, it's OK as a tool that draws ones attention to a subset of
> code that might or might not be worth looking
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:34:11AM -0400, Elshad Mustafayev wrote:
> I am sorry if I disturbed you. I just follow the steps in kernel newbies to
> get me in kernel development.
It's not you, it's checkpatch.pl plus the fairly common tendency to give
that thing a lot more respect than it deserves..
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:13:45PM -0400, Elshad Mustafayev wrote:
> > Fixed a coding style issue.
[]
> > diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
[]
> > @@ -376,9 +376,8 @@ static comp2_t encode_comp2_t(u64 value)
> > if (exp > MAXEXP2) {
> > /* Overflow. Return largest represent
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:13:45PM -0400, Elshad Mustafayev wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elshad Mustafayev
> ---
> kernel/acct.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
> index b4c667d..ed4cf00 100644
>
Fixed a coding style issue.
Signed-off-by: Elshad Mustafayev
---
kernel/acct.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/acct.c b/kernel/acct.c
index b4c667d..ed4cf00 100644
--- a/kernel/acct.c
+++ b/kernel/acct.c
@@ -376,9 +376,8 @@ static comp2_t encode_comp2
5 matches
Mail list logo