On 02/14/2013 06:58 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> I didn't see that, and using Linus' master my stop container scripts
>> > stopped working after I started using Eric's userns...
> The patch has been sitting in my for-next branch for quite a while
> just waiting for the merge window.
>
> Eric
Fi
Glauber Costa writes:
> On 02/14/2013 06:27 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Glauber Costa (glom...@parallels.com):
>>> Reboot support for pid namespaces is already implemented and it works
>>> well. However, in most containers the tasks will join all namespaces,
>>> including the now supported
On 02/14/2013 06:27 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Glauber Costa (glom...@parallels.com):
>> Reboot support for pid namespaces is already implemented and it works
>> well. However, in most containers the tasks will join all namespaces,
>> including the now supported user namespace. In that situa
Quoting Glauber Costa (glom...@parallels.com):
> Reboot support for pid namespaces is already implemented and it works
> well. However, in most containers the tasks will join all namespaces,
> including the now supported user namespace. In that situation, we will
> fail the "capable" test and won't
On 02/14/2013 12:56 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Reboot support for pid namespaces is already implemented and it works
> well. However, in most containers the tasks will join all namespaces,
> including the now supported user namespace. In that situation, we will
> fail the "capable" test and won't b
Reboot support for pid namespaces is already implemented and it works
well. However, in most containers the tasks will join all namespaces,
including the now supported user namespace. In that situation, we will
fail the "capable" test and won't be able to reboot.
The proposed solution is to allow
6 matches
Mail list logo