Re: [PATCH] kernel: replace strict_strto*() with kstrto*()

2013-09-27 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 13:18:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:53:53 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: Andrew, On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:50:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > There's some indication that this change might have broken handling of > signed types. See > https://lists

Re: [PATCH] kernel: replace strict_strto*() with kstrto*()

2013-09-27 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 19:53:53 +0200 Jean Delvare wrote: > Andrew, > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:50:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > There's some indication that this change might have broken handling of > > signed types. See > > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-September/11175

Re: [PATCH] kernel: replace strict_strto*() with kstrto*()

2013-09-27 Thread Jean Delvare
Andrew, On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:50:39 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > There's some indication that this change might have broken handling of > signed types. See > https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-September/111758.html > and https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61811. It s

Re: [PATCH] kernel: replace strict_strto*() with kstrto*()

2013-09-27 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc Jean] On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > The usage of strict_strto*() is not preferred, because > strict_strto*() is obsolete. Thus, kstrto*() should be > used. > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han > --- > kernel/gcov/fs.c |2 +- > kernel/ksysfs.c |2 +- > kernel/params

[PATCH] kernel: replace strict_strto*() with kstrto*()

2013-07-22 Thread Jingoo Han
The usage of strict_strto*() is not preferred, because strict_strto*() is obsolete. Thus, kstrto*() should be used. Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han --- kernel/gcov/fs.c |2 +- kernel/ksysfs.c |2 +- kernel/params.c | 14 +++--- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff