Muchun Song wrote:
> Fix compiler warning(as show below) for !CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
>
> kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'kill_kprobe':
> kernel/kprobes.c:1116:33: warning: statement with no effect
> [-Wunused-value]
> 1116 | #define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (-ENODEV)
> |
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 01:20:46 +0800
Muchun Song wrote:
> Fix compiler warning(as show below) for !CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
>
> kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'kill_kprobe':
> kernel/kprobes.c:1116:33: warning: statement with no effect
> [-Wunused-value]
> 1116 | #define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p)
Fix compiler warning(as show below) for !CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE.
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'kill_kprobe':
kernel/kprobes.c:1116:33: warning: statement with no effect
[-Wunused-value]
1116 | #define disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p) (-ENODEV)
| ^
On 07/01/2013 10:33 AM, Dong Fang wrote:
Fix the following compiler warning of uninitialized variable
kernel/kprobes.c: In function ‘register_kprobe’:
kernel/kprobes.c:1493: warning: ‘probed_mod’ may be used uninitialized in
this function
Signed-off-by: Dong Fang
---
Fix the following compiler warning of uninitialized variable
kernel/kprobes.c: In function âregister_kprobeâ:
kernel/kprobes.c:1493: warning: âprobed_modâ may be used uninitialized in
this function
Signed-off-by: Dong Fang
---
kernel/kprobes.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
Fix the following compiler warning of uninitialized variable
kernel/kprobes.c: In function âregister_kprobeâ:
kernel/kprobes.c:1493: warning: âprobed_modâ may be used uninitialized in
this function
Signed-off-by: Dong Fang yp.fangd...@gmail.com
---
kernel/kprobes.c |2 +-
1 files
On 07/01/2013 10:33 AM, Dong Fang wrote:
Fix the following compiler warning of uninitialized variable
kernel/kprobes.c: In function ‘register_kprobe’:
kernel/kprobes.c:1493: warning: ‘probed_mod’ may be used uninitialized in
this function
Signed-off-by: Dong Fang yp.fangd...@gmail.com
On Jan 30, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:12:17 -0600
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What are your thoughts on forward Masami patch to Linus for 2.6.20
since it fixes a real bug on PPC?
I bumped it up into the for-2.6.20 slot.
thanks.
- k
-
To
On Jan 30, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:12:17 -0600
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your thoughts on forward Masami patch to Linus for 2.6.20
since it fixes a real bug on PPC?
I bumped it up into the for-2.6.20 slot.
thanks.
- k
-
To
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:12:17 -0600
Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are your thoughts on forward Masami patch to Linus for 2.6.20
> since it fixes a real bug on PPC?
I bumped it up into the for-2.6.20 slot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Jan 30, 2007, at 1:05 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:43:33PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:43:33PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215: warning: comparison is always false due to
limited
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:43:33PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On ppc the compiler gripes about:
>
> kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
> kernel/kprobes.c:215: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
> range of data type
>
> The compiler ends up optimizing away the
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range
of data type
The compiler ends up optimizing away the test since char's are unsigned on ppc.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range
of data type
The compiler ends up optimizing away the test since char's are unsigned on ppc.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala [EMAIL
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:43:33PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
The compiler ends up optimizing away the test
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:43:33PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215: warning: comparison is always false due to
limited
On Jan 30, 2007, at 1:05 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:43:33PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
On ppc the compiler gripes about:
kernel/kprobes.c: In function 'collect_garbage_slots':
kernel/kprobes.c:215:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:12:17 -0600
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are your thoughts on forward Masami patch to Linus for 2.6.20
since it fixes a real bug on PPC?
I bumped it up into the for-2.6.20 slot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
19 matches
Mail list logo
