* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Ingo,
> Could you also pull this patch to your -tip tree?
Yeah, as long as you use Signed-off-by instead of Acked-by,
which is really how patches written by others should be
routed.
Please re-send any still pending patches that are not yet
upstream.
Thanks,
(2015/01/20 12:02), Wang Nan wrote:
> On 2015/1/12 19:24, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2015/01/05 21:31), Wang Nan wrote:
>>> In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
>>>
>>> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>>
>>>
On 2015/1/12 19:24, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2015/01/05 21:31), Wang Nan wrote:
>> In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
>>
>> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>>
>> This is because original code checks kprobes
(2015/01/05 21:31), Wang Nan wrote:
> In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
>
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
>
> This is because original code checks kprobes_all_disarmed in
> optimize_kprobe(), but this fla
In original code, the probed instruction doesn't get optimized after
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/enabled
This is because original code checks kprobes_all_disarmed in
optimize_kprobe(), but this flag is turned off after calling that
function. There
5 matches
Mail list logo