Re: [PATCH] kunit: make kunit_tool accept optional path to .kunitconfig fragment

2021-01-29 Thread Daniel Latypov
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:33 PM David Gow wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 8:17 AM Daniel Latypov wrote: > > > > Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig > > file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. > > This changes makes it so users can pass in a pat

Re: [PATCH] kunit: make kunit_tool accept optional path to .kunitconfig fragment

2021-01-28 Thread David Gow
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 8:17 AM Daniel Latypov wrote: > > Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig > file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. > This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig. > > One of the imagined use cases is having

[PATCH] kunit: make kunit_tool accept optional path to .kunitconfig fragment

2021-01-22 Thread Daniel Latypov
Currently running tests via KUnit tool means tweaking a .kunitconfig file, which you'd keep around locally and never commit. This changes makes it so users can pass in a path to a kunitconfig. One of the imagined use cases is having kunitconfig fragments in-tree to formalize interesting sets of te