On 5/18/2020 8:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 18/05/20 06:52, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
On 5/6/2020 5:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Using CPUID data can be useful for the processor compatibility
check, but that's it. Using it to compute guest-reserved bits
can have both false positives (such as LA57
On 18/05/20 06:52, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 5/6/2020 5:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Using CPUID data can be useful for the processor compatibility
>> check, but that's it. Using it to compute guest-reserved bits
>> can have both false positives (such as LA57 and UMIP which we
>> are already
On 5/6/2020 5:44 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Using CPUID data can be useful for the processor compatibility
check, but that's it. Using it to compute guest-reserved bits
can have both false positives (such as LA57 and UMIP which we
are already handling) and false negatives:
in particular, with
Using CPUID data can be useful for the processor compatibility
check, but that's it. Using it to compute guest-reserved bits
can have both false positives (such as LA57 and UMIP which we
are already handling) and false negatives: in particular, with
this patch we don't allow anymore a KVM guest
4 matches
Mail list logo
