On Sun 09-12-18 21:46:57, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > > > > + It also drops the swap size and
> > > > > > available
> > > > > > + RAM limit restriction.
> > > > >
> > > > > Minor nit: I think this
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > + It also drops the swap size and
> > > > > available
> > > > > + RAM limit restriction.
> > > >
> > > > Minor nit: I think this should explicitly mention that those two things
> > > >
On Mon 19-11-18 14:36:32, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > > + It also drops the swap size and
> > > > available
> > > > + RAM limit restriction.
> > >
> > > Minor nit: I think this should
On Mon 19-11-18 14:36:32, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > > + It also drops the swap size and
> > > > available
> > > > + RAM limit restriction.
> > >
> > > Minor nit: I think this should
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > + It also drops the swap size and available
> > > + RAM limit restriction.
> >
> > Minor nit: I think this should explicitly mention that those two things
> > are related to bare metal mitigation, to
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > + It also drops the swap size and available
> > > + RAM limit restriction.
> >
> > Minor nit: I think this should explicitly mention that those two things
> > are related to bare metal mitigation, to
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
> too
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 07:49:10PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
> too
On Tue 13-11-18 20:56:54, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> > whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> > though the limit is quite high
On Tue 13-11-18 20:56:54, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> > whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> > though the limit is quite high
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
> too restrictive for
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
> too restrictive for
On 18-11-13 19:49:10, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
> too restrictive for
On 18-11-13 19:49:10, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
> whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
> though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
> too restrictive for
From: Michal Hocko
Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
too restrictive for deployments which are willing to live with the
mitigation
From: Michal Hocko
Swap storage is restricted to max_swapfile_size (~16TB on x86_64)
whenever the system is deemed affected by L1TF vulnerability. Even
though the limit is quite high for most deployments it seems to be
too restrictive for deployments which are willing to live with the
mitigation
16 matches
Mail list logo