On Fri, 30 Dec 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 12/29/2016 10:39 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Julia,
> >>
> >> This patch doesn't apply to current for-next branch
> >> of linux-leds.git.
> >
> > The information about where it come
On 12/29/2016 10:39 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>
>> Hi Julia,
>>
>> This patch doesn't apply to current for-next branch
>> of linux-leds.git.
>
> The information about where it comes from is below the ---. It's
> automatically send to me by kbuil
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Julia,
>
> This patch doesn't apply to current for-next branch
> of linux-leds.git.
The information about where it comes from is below the ---. It's
automatically send to me by kbuild, so I don't know anything more than
that. I recall from the
Hi Julia,
This patch doesn't apply to current for-next branch
of linux-leds.git.
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
On 12/29/2016 10:10 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
> explicit put causes a double put.
>
> Generated by: scripts/c
Device node iterators put the previous value of the index variable, so an
explicit put causes a double put.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/device_node_continue.cocci
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu
---
I haven't looked at the context in detail, but given the
5 matches
Mail list logo