Re: [PATCH] lguest: don't use paravirt_probe, it's dying

Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:22 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: >> On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 20:53 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> > Frankly I think the least risk of problems comes from just doing a >> > separate entry point for lguest for now. It means we don'

[PATCH] lguest: don't use paravirt_probe, it's dying

On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 13:22 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 20:53 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Frankly I think the least risk of problems comes from just doing a > > separate entry point for lguest for now. It means we don't even have > > to touch the common code path an