On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:12 PM Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 1/30/19 4:36 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 22:01:16 +0300 Andrey Ryabinin
> > wrote:
> >> On 12/17/18 6:03 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> >>> When booting an allmodconfig kernel, there are a lot of false-positives.
> >>>
On 1/30/19 4:36 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 22:01:16 +0300 Andrey Ryabinin
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/17/18 6:03 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
>>> When booting an allmodconfig kernel, there are a lot of false-positives.
>>> With a message like this 'UBSAN: Undefined behaviour
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 22:01:16 +0300 Andrey Ryabinin
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/18 6:03 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > When booting an allmodconfig kernel, there are a lot of false-positives.
> > With a message like this 'UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in...' with a call
> > trace that follows.
> >
> >
On 12/17/18 6:03 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> When booting an allmodconfig kernel, there are a lot of false-positives.
> With a message like this 'UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in...' with a call
> trace that follows.
>
> Reworked so that when building a allmodconfig kernel that turns
> everything
When booting an allmodconfig kernel, there are a lot of false-positives.
With a message like this 'UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in...' with a call
trace that follows.
Reworked so that when building a allmodconfig kernel that turns
everything into '=m' or '=y' will turn off UBSAN_ALIGNMENT.
5 matches
Mail list logo