Re: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

2014-06-17 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 09:02 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in > > newest Linux kernel buildsystem. > > > > Actually the option is present in few GCC versions

Re: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

2014-06-16 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:48:51PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced > > > in > > > newest Linux kernel buil

Re: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

2014-06-16 Thread David Rientjes
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in > > newest Linux kernel buildsystem. > > > > Actually the option is present in few GCC versions and probably

Re: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

2014-06-16 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in > newest Linux kernel buildsystem. > > Actually the option is present in few GCC versions and probably should be > handled properly. > > Signed-off-by: An

[PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

2014-06-16 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in newest Linux kernel buildsystem. Actually the option is present in few GCC versions and probably should be handled properly. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- lib.c | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --