Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-19 Thread Tejun Heo
Max Kellermann wrote: > On 2007/04/18 09:56, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> It's more likely your chipset just has busted MSI support. Please >> post the result of 'lspci -tv' and 'lspci -nn'. > > See attachments. I found the "nomsi" workaround in a forum, and > didn't bother to

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-19 Thread Tejun Heo
Max Kellermann wrote: On 2007/04/18 09:56, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's more likely your chipset just has busted MSI support. Please post the result of 'lspci -tv' and 'lspci -nn'. See attachments. I found the nomsi workaround in a forum, and didn't bother to investigate the

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Robert Hancock
Max Kellermann wrote: Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. ata1: EH in ADMA mode, notifier 0x0 notifier_error 0x0 gen_ctl 0x1501000 status 0x400 next cpb count 0xB next cpb idx 0x0 [...] ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA IDLE, stat=0x400 ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Max Kellermann
On 2007/04/18 09:56, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's more likely your chipset just has busted MSI support. Please > post the result of 'lspci -tv' and 'lspci -nn'. See attachments. I found the "nomsi" workaround in a forum, and didn't bother to investigate the real cause yet. Max

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Will Trives
> Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. I have a Samsung 400LJ that appears to work fine with NCQ on an Intel 965 chipset motherboard (Asus P5B) and Linux kernel 2.6.20.7. Dmesg Output : scsi1 : ahci ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) ata2.00: ATA-7,

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Tejun Heo
Max Kellermann wrote: > On 2007/04/18 08:26, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can you try it on another controller? Say, a ahci or sil24? > > Seems to work ok on a Via VT8251 controller (AHCI) on kernel > 2.6.21-rc6-git4 without my NCQ disabling patch. Unfortunately, NCQ is not supported

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Max Kellermann
On 2007/04/18 08:26, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you try it on another controller? Say, a ahci or sil24? Seems to work ok on a Via VT8251 controller (AHCI) on kernel 2.6.21-rc6-git4 without my NCQ disabling patch. By the way, on this machine, I had a lot of SATA timeouts during

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Tejun Heo
Max Kellermann wrote: Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. ata1: EH in ADMA mode, notifier 0x0 notifier_error 0x0 gen_ctl 0x1501000 status 0x400 next cpb count 0xB next cpb idx 0x0 [...] ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA IDLE, stat=0x400 ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA

[PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Max Kellermann
Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. ata1: EH in ADMA mode, notifier 0x0 notifier_error 0x0 gen_ctl 0x1501000 status 0x400 next cpb count 0xB next cpb idx 0x0 [...] ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA IDLE, stat=0x400 ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA LEGACY, stat=0x400

[PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Max Kellermann
Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. ata1: EH in ADMA mode, notifier 0x0 notifier_error 0x0 gen_ctl 0x1501000 status 0x400 next cpb count 0xB next cpb idx 0x0 [...] ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA IDLE, stat=0x400 ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA LEGACY, stat=0x400

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Tejun Heo
Max Kellermann wrote: Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. ata1: EH in ADMA mode, notifier 0x0 notifier_error 0x0 gen_ctl 0x1501000 status 0x400 next cpb count 0xB next cpb idx 0x0 [...] ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA IDLE, stat=0x400 ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Max Kellermann
On 2007/04/18 08:26, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you try it on another controller? Say, a ahci or sil24? Seems to work ok on a Via VT8251 controller (AHCI) on kernel 2.6.21-rc6-git4 without my NCQ disabling patch. By the way, on this machine, I had a lot of SATA timeouts during

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Tejun Heo
Max Kellermann wrote: On 2007/04/18 08:26, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you try it on another controller? Say, a ahci or sil24? Seems to work ok on a Via VT8251 controller (AHCI) on kernel 2.6.21-rc6-git4 without my NCQ disabling patch. Unfortunately, NCQ is not supported on

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Will Trives
Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. I have a Samsung 400LJ that appears to work fine with NCQ on an Intel 965 chipset motherboard (Asus P5B) and Linux kernel 2.6.20.7. Dmesg Output : scsi1 : ahci ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300) ata2.00: ATA-7,

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Max Kellermann
On 2007/04/18 09:56, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's more likely your chipset just has busted MSI support. Please post the result of 'lspci -tv' and 'lspci -nn'. See attachments. I found the nomsi workaround in a forum, and didn't bother to investigate the real cause yet. Max

Re: [PATCH] libata: add Samsung HD401LJ to the NCQ blacklist

2007-04-18 Thread Robert Hancock
Max Kellermann wrote: Yet another hard drive which doesn't seem to get NCQ right. ata1: EH in ADMA mode, notifier 0x0 notifier_error 0x0 gen_ctl 0x1501000 status 0x400 next cpb count 0xB next cpb idx 0x0 [...] ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA IDLE, stat=0x400 ata1: timeout waiting for ADMA