On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:59:26AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:46:01AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > ata: Add a new flag for sas controller
> >
> > Add a new flag to destinguish sas controller. sas controller has its own tag
> > allocation, which doesn't directly match to a
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:46:01AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> ata: Add a new flag for sas controller
>
> Add a new flag to destinguish sas controller. sas controller has its own tag
> allocation, which doesn't directly match to ata tag. We use the new flag for
> sas ata tag allocation.
This doesn
On 03/12/2015 08:46 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Yep. Tony, can you please try below patch please?
>
>
> ata: Add a new flag for sas controller
>
> Add a new flag to destinguish sas controller. sas controller has its own tag
> allocation, which doesn't directly match to ata tag. We use the new flag for
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 08:11:57AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:14:24AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ int sas_ata_init(struct domain_device *found_dev)
> > >
> > > ap->private_data = found_dev;
> > > ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_SATA;
> > > -
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:14:24AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > @@ -572,7 +572,6 @@ int sas_ata_init(struct domain_device *found_dev)
> >
> > ap->private_data = found_dev;
> > ap->cbl = ATA_CBL_SATA;
> > - ap->scsi_host = shost;
> > rc = ata_sas_port_init(ap);
> >
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:19:27PM -0400, Tony Battersby wrote:
>> On 03/11/2015 05:45 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> > On 03/11/2015 02:15 PM, Tony Battersby wrote:
>> >> This reverts commits 12cb5ce101abfaf74421f8cc9f196e708209eb79 and
>> >> 98bd4b
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:19:27PM -0400, Tony Battersby wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 05:45 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 03/11/2015 02:15 PM, Tony Battersby wrote:
> >> This reverts commits 12cb5ce101abfaf74421f8cc9f196e708209eb79 and
> >> 98bd4be1ba95f2fe7f543910792b7163a5de06eb.
> >>
> >> Commit 12cb5c
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:19:27PM -0400, Tony Battersby wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 05:45 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 03/11/2015 02:15 PM, Tony Battersby wrote:
> >> This reverts commits 12cb5ce101abfaf74421f8cc9f196e708209eb79 and
> >> 98bd4be1ba95f2fe7f543910792b7163a5de06eb.
> >>
> >> Commit 12cb5c
On 03/11/2015 05:45 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 03/11/2015 02:15 PM, Tony Battersby wrote:
>> This reverts commits 12cb5ce101abfaf74421f8cc9f196e708209eb79 and
>> 98bd4be1ba95f2fe7f543910792b7163a5de06eb.
>>
>> Commit 12cb5ce101ab ("libata: use blk taging") causes the following oops
>> with scsi-mq
On 03/11/2015 02:15 PM, Tony Battersby wrote:
This reverts commits 12cb5ce101abfaf74421f8cc9f196e708209eb79 and
98bd4be1ba95f2fe7f543910792b7163a5de06eb.
Commit 12cb5ce101ab ("libata: use blk taging") causes the following oops
with scsi-mq enabled:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dere
This reverts commits 12cb5ce101abfaf74421f8cc9f196e708209eb79 and
98bd4be1ba95f2fe7f543910792b7163a5de06eb.
Commit 12cb5ce101ab ("libata: use blk taging") causes the following oops
with scsi-mq enabled:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0058
IP: [] ata_qc_new_in
11 matches
Mail list logo