Torsten Kaiser wrote:
On 11/1/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ lo = tf->lbam;
+ hi = tf->lbam;
+ ibyte = (hi << 8) | lo;
+
+ lo = result_tf->lbam;
+ hi = result_tf->lbam;
That doesn't look right.
I suspect this was intended:
lo = tf->lbam;
hi = tf->lb
On 11/1/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + lo = tf->lbam;
> + hi = tf->lbam;
> + ibyte = (hi << 8) | lo;
> +
> + lo = result_tf->lbam;
> + hi = result_tf->lbam;
That doesn't look right.
I suspect this was intended:
lo = tf->lbam;
hi = tf->lbah;
Torsten
-
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 05:54:06 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:07:33 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> This is purely for comment and testing, not for merging (yet?).
> >>
> >> A common recipe in several vendor drivers
Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:07:33 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is purely for comment and testing, not for merging (yet?).
A common recipe in several vendor drivers (either GPL'd, or I have NDA'd
access to use them as a documentation-like reference) for ATAPI was
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 05:07:33 -0400
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is purely for comment and testing, not for merging (yet?).
>
> A common recipe in several vendor drivers (either GPL'd, or I have NDA'd
> access to use them as a documentation-like reference) for ATAPI was
> slight
This is purely for comment and testing, not for merging (yet?).
A common recipe in several vendor drivers (either GPL'd, or I have NDA'd
access to use them as a documentation-like reference) for ATAPI was
slightly different from ours. This recipe can be found in
atapi_tf_xfer_size(), and it's sl
6 matches
Mail list logo