Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-18 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
@kernel.org> >> > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200 >> > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h >> > some more >> > >> > Before: >> > >> > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed >> >

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-18 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
3:23 +0200 >> > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h >> > some more >> > >> > Before: >> > >> > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed >> > # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec >> >

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-07 Thread Andrea Parri
..@kernel.org> > > > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h > > > some more > > > > > > Before: > > > > > > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relax

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-07 Thread Andrea Parri
:23 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h > > > some more > > > > > > Before: > > > > > > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed > > > # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec > > >

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrea Parri <andrea.pa...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> > > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] lo

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-06 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrea Parri wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Ingo Molnar > > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-06 Thread Andrea Parri
Hi Ingo, > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h > some more >

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-06 Thread Andrea Parri
Hi Ingo, > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ingo Molnar > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h > some more > > Before: > > #ifndef atomic_fe

[PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
ons(+), 720 deletions(-) Note that I kept the second patch separate, because technically it changes the way we use the defines - it should not break anything, unless I missed some detail. Please keep this kind of clarity and simplicity in new instrumentation patches! Thanks, Ingo ==

[PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h some more

2018-05-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
at I kept the second patch separate, because technically it changes the way we use the defines - it should not break anything, unless I missed some detail. Please keep this kind of clarity and simplicity in new instrumentation patches! Thanks, Ingo ==> >