@kernel.org>
>> > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
>> > some more
>> >
>> > Before:
>> >
>> > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
>> >
3:23 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
>> > some more
>> >
>> > Before:
>> >
>> > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
>> > # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
>> >
..@kernel.org>
> > > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
> > > some more
> > >
> > > Before:
> > >
> > > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relax
:23 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
> > > some more
> > >
> > > Before:
> > >
> > > #ifndef atomic_fetch_dec_relaxed
> > > # ifndef atomic_fetch_dec
> > >
* Andrea Parri <andrea.pa...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] lo
* Andrea Parri wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> > From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ingo Molnar
> > Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
Hi Ingo,
> From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
> some more
>
Hi Ingo,
> From 5affbf7e91901143f84f1b2ca64f4afe70e210fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar
> Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:23:23 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Simplify the op definitions in atomic.h
> some more
>
> Before:
>
> #ifndef atomic_fe
ons(+), 720 deletions(-)
Note that I kept the second patch separate, because technically it changes the
way
we use the defines - it should not break anything, unless I missed some detail.
Please keep this kind of clarity and simplicity in new instrumentation patches!
Thanks,
Ingo
==
at I kept the second patch separate, because technically it changes the
way
we use the defines - it should not break anything, unless I missed some detail.
Please keep this kind of clarity and simplicity in new instrumentation patches!
Thanks,
Ingo
==>
>
10 matches
Mail list logo