On 2016年06月14日 18:40, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:11:48PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月08日 17:22, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
the
On 2016年06月14日 18:40, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:11:48PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月08日 17:22, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
the
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:11:48PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
>
> On 2016年06月08日 17:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >>strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
> >>the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:11:48PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
>
> On 2016年06月08日 17:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >>strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
> >>the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not
On 2016年06月08日 17:22, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not >cnts in big
endian machine.
Do as what read unlock does. we are
On 2016年06月08日 17:22, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not >cnts in big
endian machine.
Do as what read unlock does. we are
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
> the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not >cnts in big
> endian machine.
>
> Do as what read unlock does. we are lucky that the __qrwlock->wmode's
>
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:09:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
> the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not >cnts in big
> endian machine.
>
> Do as what read unlock does. we are lucky that the __qrwlock->wmode's
>
On 2016年06月04日 04:57, Waiman Long wrote:
On 06/03/2016 03:17 AM, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月02日 19:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
On 2016年06月04日 04:57, Waiman Long wrote:
On 06/03/2016 03:17 AM, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月02日 19:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
On 06/03/2016 03:17 AM, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月02日 19:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index
On 06/03/2016 03:17 AM, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月02日 19:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index
On 2016年06月02日 19:15, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:01:17PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月02日 18:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index
On 2016年06月02日 19:15, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:01:17PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
On 2016年06月02日 18:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index
On 2016年06月02日 19:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
---
On 2016年06月02日 19:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
---
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:01:17PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
>
> On 2016年06月02日 18:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >>diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> >>index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> >>---
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:01:17PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
>
> On 2016年06月02日 18:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> >>diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> >>index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> >>---
On 2016年06月02日 18:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
@@ -139,7
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > +++
On 2016年06月02日 18:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
@@ -139,7
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:44:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> > +++
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline void
On Thursday, June 2, 2016 6:09:08 PM CEST Pan Xinhui wrote:
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> index 54a8e65..eadd7a3 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qrwlock.h
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static inline void
strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not >cnts in big
endian machine.
Do as what read unlock does. we are lucky that the __qrwlock->wmode's
val is _QW_LOCKED.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
strcut __qrwlock has different layout in big endian machine. we need set
the __qrwlock->wmode to NULL, and the address is not >cnts in big
endian machine.
Do as what read unlock does. we are lucky that the __qrwlock->wmode's
val is _QW_LOCKED.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
---
26 matches
Mail list logo