ACK - the patch is fine for lpfc
-- james s
Linas Vepstas wrote:
James,
Please review and forward upstream. This is a patch I'd previously
submitted, and reworked by [EMAIL PROTECTED] in January.
Not clear if I need to also nag James Smart (who is listed as the
maintainer) for an
James,
Please review and forward upstream. This is a patch I'd previously
submitted, and reworked by [EMAIL PROTECTED] in January.
Not clear if I need to also nag James Smart (who is listed as the
maintainer) for an Acked-by (which I am lead to beleive should be
forthcoming? Ahh the joys of
James,
Please review and forward upstream. This is a patch I'd previously
submitted, and reworked by [EMAIL PROTECTED] in January.
Not clear if I need to also nag James Smart (who is listed as the
maintainer) for an Acked-by (which I am lead to beleive should be
forthcoming? Ahh the joys of
ACK - the patch is fine for lpfc
-- james s
Linas Vepstas wrote:
James,
Please review and forward upstream. This is a patch I'd previously
submitted, and reworked by [EMAIL PROTECTED] in January.
Not clear if I need to also nag James Smart (who is listed as the
maintainer) for an
4 matches
Mail list logo