On 03/22/2013 11:36 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:28:47PM -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Sorry I am now not sure I follow you here. Someone just pointed out to
>> me that PTR_RET() is defined as ...
>>
>> static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr)
>> {
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:28:47PM -0500, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Sorry I am now not sure I follow you here. Someone just pointed out to
> me that PTR_RET() is defined as ...
>
> static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr)
> {
> if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> return PTR_ERR(ptr);
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 03/12/2013 06:05 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:58:29AM +0200, Silviu-Mihai Popescu wrote:
>>> This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase
>>> readability.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: S
On 03/12/2013 06:05 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:58:29AM +0200, Silviu-Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase
>> readability.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:58:29AM +0200, Silviu-Mihai Popescu wrote:
> This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase
> readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c |4 ++--
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/fb.c |5 +
> a
This uses PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in order to increase
readability.
Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c |4 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/fb.c |5 +
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c|2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pmu.c |5 +
4
6 matches
Mail list logo