Re: [PATCH] macsec: dynamically allocate space for sglist

2017-04-25, 17:23:00 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > We call skb_cow_data, which is good anyway to ensure we can actually > modify the skb as such (another error from prior). Now that we have the > number of fragments required, we can safely allocate exactly that amount > of memory. > >

Re: [PATCH] macsec: dynamically allocate space for sglist

2017-04-25, 17:23:00 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > We call skb_cow_data, which is good anyway to ensure we can actually > modify the skb as such (another error from prior). Now that we have the > number of fragments required, we can safely allocate exactly that amount > of memory. > >

[PATCH] macsec: dynamically allocate space for sglist

We call skb_cow_data, which is good anyway to ensure we can actually modify the skb as such (another error from prior). Now that we have the number of fragments required, we can safely allocate exactly that amount of memory. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Cc: Sabrina Dubroca

[PATCH] macsec: dynamically allocate space for sglist

We call skb_cow_data, which is good anyway to ensure we can actually modify the skb as such (another error from prior). Now that we have the number of fragments required, we can safely allocate exactly that amount of memory. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Cc: Sabrina Dubroca Cc: