Re: [PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:21:58AM +, Xu Wang wrote: > seq_puts is a lot cheaper than seq_printf, so use that to print > literal strings. > > Signed-off-by: Xu Wang Applied, thanks. - Ted

Re: [PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts

On 8/10/20 7:51 AM, Xu Wang wrote: seq_puts is a lot cheaper than seq_printf, so use that to print literal strings. Signed-off-by: Xu Wang Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani

[PATCH] mballoc: Replace seq_printf with seq_puts

seq_puts is a lot cheaper than seq_printf, so use that to print literal strings. Signed-off-by: Xu Wang --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index c0a331e2feb0..77288e549a95 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c