> On Oct 18, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
>>> On 10/16/2017 05:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() a
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Michael Lyle wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 05:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>>
On 10/16/2017 05:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Kent Overstreet
> Cc: Shaohua Li
> Cc: Alasdair Ker
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:01:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> to pass the timer pointer
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:01:48PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
If you send the md.c part along, I'll apply
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: Kent Overstreet
Cc: Shaohua Li
Cc: Alasdair Kergon
Cc: Mike Snitzer
Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
Cc: linu
6 matches
Mail list logo