Re: [PATCH] md: Fix data corruption when a degraded raid5 array is reshaped.

On Thursday January 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On closer look the safer test is: > > !test_bit(STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK, &sh->ops.pending). > > The 'req_compute' field only indicates that a 'compute_block' operation > was requested during this pass through handle_stripe so that we can >

Re: [PATCH] md: Fix data corruption when a degraded raid5 array is reshaped.

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 16:00 -0700, Williams, Dan J wrote: > On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:46 -0700, NeilBrown wrote: > > This patch fixes a fairly serious bug in md/raid5 in 2.6.23 and > 24-rc. > > It would be great if it cold get into 23.13 and 24.final. > > Thanks. > > NeilBrown > > > > ### Comments f

Re: [PATCH] md: Fix data corruption when a degraded raid5 array is reshaped.

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 15:46 -0700, NeilBrown wrote: > This patch fixes a fairly serious bug in md/raid5 in 2.6.23 and 24-rc. > It would be great if it cold get into 23.13 and 24.final. > Thanks. > NeilBrown > > ### Comments for Changeset > > We currently do not wait for the block from the missing

[PATCH] md: Fix data corruption when a degraded raid5 array is reshaped.

This patch fixes a fairly serious bug in md/raid5 in 2.6.23 and 24-rc. It would be great if it cold get into 23.13 and 24.final. Thanks. NeilBrown ### Comments for Changeset We currently do not wait for the block from the missing device to be computed from parity before copying data to the new st