On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Paul Taysom wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Paul Taysom wrote:
>> seconds_kernel_to_login: 8.17s
>> Passed all my other tests
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Paul Taysom tay...@google.com wrote:
Looks good to me.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Paul Taysom tay...@google.com wrote:
seconds_kernel_to_login: 8.17s
Passed all my other tests
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mikulas Patocka mpato...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks good to me.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Paul Taysom wrote:
> seconds_kernel_to_login: 8.17s
> Passed all my other tests
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon
Looks good to me.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Paul Taysom tay...@google.com wrote:
seconds_kernel_to_login: 8.17s
Passed all my other tests
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mikulas Patocka mpato...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42
seconds_kernel_to_login: 8.17s
Passed all my other tests
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
>> >> @@
seconds_kernel_to_login: 8.17s
Passed all my other tests
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Mikulas Patocka mpato...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
> >> @@ -449,8 +468,14 @@ static void verity_prefetch_io(struct dm_verity *v,
> >> struct dm_verity_io *io)
> >>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
>> @@ -449,8 +468,14 @@ static void verity_prefetch_io(struct dm_verity *v,
>> struct dm_verity_io *io)
>> hash_block_end = v->hash_blocks - 1;
>>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
> Am Montag, den 04.03.2013, 08:45 -0800 schrieb Paul Taysom:
> > Changed the dm-verity prefetching to use a worker thread to avoid
> > a deadlock in dm-bufio.
>
> Do you know of any bug reports about this? Searching for »dm-verity dead
> lock«
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
> @@ -449,8 +468,14 @@ static void verity_prefetch_io(struct dm_verity *v,
> struct dm_verity_io *io)
> hash_block_end = v->hash_blocks - 1;
> }
> no_prefetch_cluster:
> -
Am Montag, den 04.03.2013, 08:45 -0800 schrieb Paul Taysom:
> Changed the dm-verity prefetching to use a worker thread to avoid
> a deadlock in dm-bufio.
Do you know of any bug reports about this? Searching for »dm-verity dead
lock« I found [1], which seems to be the issue, right? If yes, please
Changed the dm-verity prefetching to use a worker thread to avoid
a deadlock in dm-bufio.
If generic_make_request is called recursively, it queues the I/O
request on the current->bio_list without making the I/O request
and returns. The routine making the recursive call cannot wait
for the I/O to
Changed the dm-verity prefetching to use a worker thread to avoid
a deadlock in dm-bufio.
If generic_make_request is called recursively, it queues the I/O
request on the current-bio_list without making the I/O request
and returns. The routine making the recursive call cannot wait
for the I/O to
Am Montag, den 04.03.2013, 08:45 -0800 schrieb Paul Taysom:
Changed the dm-verity prefetching to use a worker thread to avoid
a deadlock in dm-bufio.
Do you know of any bug reports about this? Searching for »dm-verity dead
lock« I found [1], which seems to be the issue, right? If yes, please
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
@@ -449,8 +468,14 @@ static void verity_prefetch_io(struct dm_verity *v,
struct dm_verity_io *io)
hash_block_end = v-hash_blocks - 1;
}
no_prefetch_cluster:
-
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Paul Menzel pm.deb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Montag, den 04.03.2013, 08:45 -0800 schrieb Paul Taysom:
Changed the dm-verity prefetching to use a worker thread to avoid
a deadlock in dm-bufio.
Do you know of any bug reports about this? Searching for
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
@@ -449,8 +468,14 @@ static void verity_prefetch_io(struct dm_verity *v,
struct dm_verity_io *io)
hash_block_end = v-hash_blocks
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Paul Taysom wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Alasdair G Kergon a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:48AM -0800, Paul Taysom wrote:
@@ -449,8 +468,14 @@ static void verity_prefetch_io(struct dm_verity *v,
struct dm_verity_io *io)
18 matches
Mail list logo
