From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:05:27 -0700
> On 05/10/2017 08:20 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
>> There is a potential unnecessary refcount decriment on error path of
>> put_device(>mii_bus->dev), as it is possible to avoid the
>> of_mdio_find_bus() call if mux_bus
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:05:27 -0700
> On 05/10/2017 08:20 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
>> There is a potential unnecessary refcount decriment on error path of
>> put_device(>mii_bus->dev), as it is possible to avoid the
>> of_mdio_find_bus() call if mux_bus is specified by the
On 05/10/2017 08:20 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
> There is a potential unnecessary refcount decriment on error path of
> put_device(>mii_bus->dev), as it is possible to avoid the
> of_mdio_find_bus() call if mux_bus is specified by the calling function.
>
> The same put_device() is not called in the
On 05/10/2017 08:20 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
> There is a potential unnecessary refcount decriment on error path of
> put_device(>mii_bus->dev), as it is possible to avoid the
> of_mdio_find_bus() call if mux_bus is specified by the calling function.
>
> The same put_device() is not called in the
There is a potential unnecessary refcount decriment on error path of
put_device(>mii_bus->dev), as it is possible to avoid the
of_mdio_find_bus() call if mux_bus is specified by the calling function.
The same put_device() is not called in the error path if the
devm_kzalloc of pb fails. This
There is a potential unnecessary refcount decriment on error path of
put_device(>mii_bus->dev), as it is possible to avoid the
of_mdio_find_bus() call if mux_bus is specified by the calling function.
The same put_device() is not called in the error path if the
devm_kzalloc of pb fails. This
6 matches
Mail list logo