On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:38 PM Robert Foss wrote:
>
> Thanks for digging into this everyone!
>
> Assuming Tomasz doesn't find any stretching, I think we can conclude
> that this mode works, and should be kept. Thanks Dongchun for parsing
> the datasheet and finding the Bayer mode issue for the
Thanks for digging into this everyone!
Assuming Tomasz doesn't find any stretching, I think we can conclude
that this mode works, and should be kept. Thanks Dongchun for parsing
the datasheet and finding the Bayer mode issue for the two other
recently added resolutions.
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 7:00 PM Robert Foss wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 08:32, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bingbu,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bingbu Cao
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/24/20 6:20 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:42, Bingbu
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 at 08:32, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi Bingbu,
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bingbu Cao wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/24/20 6:20 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:42, Bingbu Cao
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi, Robert
> > >>
> > >> I remember that the
Hi Bingbu,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bingbu Cao wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/24/20 6:20 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:42, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Robert
> >>
> >> I remember that the full size of ov8856 image sensor is 3296x2480 and we
> >> can get the 3280x2464
>
On 11/24/20 6:20 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:42, Bingbu Cao wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Robert
>>
>> I remember that the full size of ov8856 image sensor is 3296x2480 and we can
>> get the 3280x2464
>> frames based on current settings.
>>
>> Do you have any issues with this mode?
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:52 AM Robert Foss wrote:
>
> Remove the 3280x2464 mode as it can't be reproduced and yields
> an output resolution of 3264x2448 instead of the desired one.
>
> Furthermore the 3264x2448 resolution is the highest resolution
> that the product brief lists.
>
>
>
> OV8856 sensor array region consists of 3 main window settings.
> The inner window is controlled by [H_win_off, V_win_off].
> From the old unusual 3280x2464 and 1640x1232 setting,
> H_win_off(R3810-R3811) is 0, V_win_off(R3812-R3813) is 1.
>
> Considering that the register
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:42, Bingbu Cao wrote:
>
> Hi, Robert
>
> I remember that the full size of ov8856 image sensor is 3296x2480 and we can
> get the 3280x2464
> frames based on current settings.
>
> Do you have any issues with this mode?
As far as I can tell using the 3280x2464 mode
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 11:17, Dongchun Zhu (朱东春)
wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
> Just updated the identification method of first pixel on list.
>
> The bayer order for the new setting (either FULL or BINNING mode) shall be
> BG/GR.
>
> This has been proved both theoretically and experimentally.
Hi Sakari,
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 10:43 +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Dongchun,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:40:51PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > > static const struct ov8856_mode supported_modes[] = {
> > > - {
> > > - .width = 3280,
> > > - .height = 2464,
> > > -
Hi, Robert
I remember that the full size of ov8856 image sensor is 3296x2480 and we can
get the 3280x2464
frames based on current settings.
Do you have any issues with this mode?
On 11/16/20 11:50 PM, Robert Foss wrote:
> 0x3812, 0x00},
> 236 {0x3813, 0x01},
--
Best regards,
Bingbu Cao
Hi Dongchun,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:40:51PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > static const struct ov8856_mode supported_modes[] = {
> > - {
> > - .width = 3280,
> > - .height = 2464,
> > - .hts = 1928,
> > - .vts_def = 2488,
> > - .vts_min =
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the patch.
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 16:50 +0100, Robert Foss wrote:
> Remove the 3280x2464 mode as it can't be reproduced and yields
> an output resolution of 3264x2448 instead of the desired one.
>
> Furthermore the 3264x2448 resolution is the highest resolution
> that the
Remove the 3280x2464 mode as it can't be reproduced and yields
an output resolution of 3264x2448 instead of the desired one.
Furthermore the 3264x2448 resolution is the highest resolution
that the product brief lists.
Since 3280x2464 neither works correctly nor seems to be supported
by the
15 matches
Mail list logo
