It is redundant to do irqsave and irqrestore in hardIRQ context.
Signed-off-by: Daode Huang <huangda...@huawei.com>
---
drivers/media/rc/ite-cir.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/ite-cir.c b/drivers/media/rc/ite-cir.c
index 0c62295..4a51ca80 100644
--- a/drivers/media/rc/ite-cir.c
+++ b/drivers/media/rc/ite-cir.c
@@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static void ite_set_carrier_params(struct ite_dev *dev)
static irqreturn_t ite_cir_isr(int irq, void *data)
{
struct ite_dev *dev = data;
- unsigned long flags;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_RETVAL(IRQ_NONE);
u8 rx_buf[ITE_RX_FIFO_LEN];
int rx_bytes;
@@ -271,7 +270,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ite_cir_isr(int irq, void *data)
ite_dbg_verbose("%s firing", __func__);
/* grab the spinlock */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&dev->lock);
/* read the interrupt flags */
iflags = dev->params.get_irq_causes(dev);
@@ -287,17 +286,14 @@ static irqreturn_t ite_cir_isr(int irq, void *data)
/* drop the spinlock, since the ir-core layer
* may call us back again through
* ite_s_idle() */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->
- lock,
- flags);
+ spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
/* decode the data we've just received */
ite_decode_bytes(dev, rx_buf,
rx_bytes);
/* reacquire the spinlock */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock,
- flags);
+ spin_lock(&dev->lock);
/* mark the interrupt as serviced */
ret = IRQ_RETVAL(IRQ_HANDLED);
@@ -314,7 +310,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ite_cir_isr(int irq, void *data)
}
/* drop the spinlock */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
ite_dbg_verbose("%s done returning %d", __func__, (int)ret);
--
2.8.1
