Re: [PATCH] memory tier: rename destroy_memory_type() to put_memory_type()

On 2023/7/6 19:58, Xiao Yang wrote: > On 2023/7/6 14:39, Miaohe Lin wrote: >> It appears that destroy_memory_type() isn't a very good name because >> we usually will not free the memory_type here. So rename it to a more >> appropriate name i.e. put_memory_type(). >> >> Suggested-by: Huang, Ying

Re: [PATCH] memory tier: rename destroy_memory_type() to put_memory_type()

On 2023/7/6 14:39, Miaohe Lin wrote: It appears that destroy_memory_type() isn't a very good name because we usually will not free the memory_type here. So rename it to a more appropriate name i.e. put_memory_type(). Suggested-by: Huang, Ying Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- drivers/dax/kmem.c

Re: [PATCH] memory tier: rename destroy_memory_type() to put_memory_type()

Miaohe Lin writes: > It appears that destroy_memory_type() isn't a very good name because > we usually will not free the memory_type here. So rename it to a more > appropriate name i.e. put_memory_type(). > > Suggested-by: Huang, Ying > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin LGTM, Thanks! Reviewed-by:

[PATCH] memory tier: rename destroy_memory_type() to put_memory_type()

It appears that destroy_memory_type() isn't a very good name because we usually will not free the memory_type here. So rename it to a more appropriate name i.e. put_memory_type(). Suggested-by: Huang, Ying Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin --- drivers/dax/kmem.c | 4 ++--