On Saturday 20 December 2014 10:43:48 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik writes:
> > Arnd Bergmann writes:
> >> This looks a bit ambiguous: You get a GPIO line for the purpose of the
> >> IRQ nesting but don't use the GPIO otherwise, and you pass the device's
> >> own irq domain start as an I
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
>> On Monday 15 December 2014 00:10:06 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>>> +
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cot);
>>> + cot->gpio0 = gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "lubbock_irq", 0);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(cot->gpio0)) {
>>> + dev_err(&pd
Arnd Bergmann writes:
>> Will that look correct ?
>
> I'd still prefer the platform data, but this seems good enough and I
> see no serious problems with it.
OK, so I'll try with the 2 resources. If I'm bitten afterwards and am forced to
have a platform data, you'll tell me "I had warned you" ;)
On Monday 15 December 2014 16:45:03 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
> > On Monday 15 December 2014 00:10:06 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> +
> >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cot);
> >> + cot->gpio0 = gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "lubbock_irq", 0);
> >> + if (IS_ERR(cot->gp
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> On Monday 15 December 2014 00:10:06 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cot);
>> + cot->gpio0 = gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "lubbock_irq", 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(cot->gpio0)) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't request GPIO :
On Monday 15 December 2014 00:10:06 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cot);
> + cot->gpio0 = gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "lubbock_irq", 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(cot->gpio0)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't request GPIO : ret = %d\n",
> ret);
> +
Cottula board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its
initialization and probing happened at postc
7 matches
Mail list logo
