On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson
>
> This is a sucky change to bump up the time we'll wait for the EC. Why
> is it sucky? If 200ms for a transfer is a common thing it will have a
> massively bad impact on keyboard responsiveness.
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Doug Anderson
>
> This is a sucky change to bump up the time we'll wait for the EC. Why
> is it sucky? If 200ms for a transfer is a common thing it will have a
> massively bad impact on keyboard responsiveness.
>
> It still seems
From: Doug Anderson
This is a sucky change to bump up the time we'll wait for the EC. Why
is it sucky? If 200ms for a transfer is a common thing it will have a
massively bad impact on keyboard responsiveness.
It still seems like a good idea to do this, though, because
From: Doug Anderson
This is a sucky change to bump up the time we'll wait for the EC. Why
is it sucky? If 200ms for a transfer is a common thing it will have a
massively bad impact on keyboard responsiveness.
It still seems like a good idea to do this, though, because we have a
gas gauge that
4 matches
Mail list logo