On 4 August 2018 at 01:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> In case of Device Tree platforms, even though the Samsung PMIC sec
>> device is instantiated from DT, the driver is still matched through I2C
>> module ali
Hi Krzysztof,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> In case of Device Tree platforms, even though the Samsung PMIC sec
> device is instantiated from DT, the driver is still matched through I2C
> module alias. That is because I2C core always reports an I2C module
> alias i
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> In case of Device Tree platforms, even though the Samsung PMIC sec
> device is instantiated from DT, the driver is still matched through I2C
> module alias. That is because I2C core always reports an I2C module
> alias instead of DT one.
>
> This
In case of Device Tree platforms, even though the Samsung PMIC sec
device is instantiated from DT, the driver is still matched through I2C
module alias. That is because I2C core always reports an I2C module
alias instead of DT one.
This could change in the future so export DT module alias.
Signe
4 matches
Mail list logo