On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:38:55AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> I guess there are two parts here applying the hardware patch and
> the manual application of the register patch. Applying the
> hardware patch restores registers once it is finished anyway, and
> the actual patch is applied by the w
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:38:55AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:30:58AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:26:48PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >
> > > As the cache_bypass is not strictly necessary for applying the patches
> > > (the device is al
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:30:58AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:26:48PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > As the cache_bypass is not strictly necessary for applying the patches
> > (the device is always powered on whilst it is applied) remove the calls
> > to regcache_cac
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:26:48PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> As the cache_bypass is not strictly necessary for applying the patches
> (the device is always powered on whilst it is applied) remove the calls
> to regcache_cache_bypass to avoid this situation.
That's not why the cache bypass is
On the wm5102 the register patches are applied manually, rather than by
the regmap core. This application is wrapped in calls to
regcache_cache_bypass. However, this is dangerous as other threads may
be accessing the hardware at the same time as the pm_runtime operations
and if they do so during th
5 matches
Mail list logo
