Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition

2005-09-08 Thread Andi Kleen
Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > > (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get > > line wrapped.) > > > > A trivial addition to the EFL definitions. > > Why? They're obviously not needed in

Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition

2005-09-08 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08.09.05 16:32:16 >>> >On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get >> line wrapped.) >> >> A trivial addition to the EFL definitions. > >Why? They're obviously not

Re: [PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition

2005-09-08 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:30:03PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > (Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get > line wrapped.) > > A trivial addition to the EFL definitions. Why? They're obviously not needed in kernelspace.. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTE

[PATCH] minor ELF definitions addition

2005-09-08 Thread Jan Beulich
(Note: Patch also attached because the inline version is certain to get line wrapped.) A trivial addition to the EFL definitions. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Npru 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2.6.13-elf/include/linux/elf.h --- 2.6.13/include/linux/elf.h 2005-08-29 01:41:0