Hello,
this patch was inspired by the Stanford checker (the report was sent out a
while ago, but I'm just getting around to submitting the patch).
They pointed out two instances of dereferencing potentially NULL pointers
in the UFS code, one of which was valid, and the other was incorrect (so
Hello,
this patch was inspired by the Stanford checker (the report was sent out a
while ago, but I'm just getting around to submitting the patch).
They pointed out two instances of dereferencing potentially NULL pointers
in the UFS code, one of which was valid, and the other was incorrect (so
2 matches
Mail list logo