On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, David Brownell wrote:
> > > > AFAICS, fallout from repacing include of blkdev.h with include of bio.h.
> > >
> > > Out of curiousity, which architecture(s) need this?
> >
> > Umm... IIRC, m32r had been the first build to step into that, at which
> > point
> > the missing in
> > > AFAICS, fallout from repacing include of blkdev.h with include of bio.h.
> >
> > Out of curiousity, which architecture(s) need this?
>
> Umm... IIRC, m32r had been the first build to step into that, at which point
> the missing include had been added; the rest had reached that point later,
L PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] missing include in mmc
> >
> > AFAICS, fallout from repacing include of blkdev.h with include of bio.h.
>
> Out of curiousity, which architecture(s) need this?
Umm... IIRC, m32r had been the first build to step
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 16 17:18:43 2007
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:09:07 +0100
> From: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] missing include in mmc
>
AFAICS, fallout from repacing include of blkdev.h with include of bio.h.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
index 71b986b..7ae18ea 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
@@ -30,6 +30,
5 matches
Mail list logo