On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:35:00PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>
> > But I would prefer to have GPF_HIGHUSER movable by default and
> > GFP_HIGHUSER_UNMOVABLE to opt out.
> >
>
> Sounds like a separate patch.
There are few questions before prepa
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> But I would prefer to have GPF_HIGHUSER movable by default and
> GFP_HIGHUSER_UNMOVABLE to opt out.
>
Sounds like a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vg
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> GFP_USER, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE are escalatedly
> confined defined, also implied by their names:
>
> GFP_USER = GFP_USER
> GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM = GFP_HIGHUSER
> GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:43:47AM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> GFP_USER, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE are escalatedly
> confined defined, also implied by their names:
>
> GFP_USER = GFP_USER
> GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM = GFP_HIGHUSER
> GFP_
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:43:47AM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> GFP_USER, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE are escalatedly
> confined defined, also implied by their names:
>
> GFP_USER = GFP_USER
> GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM = GFP_HIGHUSER
> GFP_
GFP_USER, GFP_HIGHUSER and GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE are escalatedly
confined defined, also implied by their names:
GFP_USER = GFP_USER
GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM = GFP_HIGHUSER
GFP_USER + __GFP_HIGHMEM + __GFP_MOVABLE = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE
So just mak
6 matches
Mail list logo
